Designed to mimic a delicate natural environment, the Grow Pod's unique shape and material qualities are only made possible through 3D printing. The pod creates a safe microenvironment for the growth of a vegetable seedling. The lower portion of the container has pockets that hold a small amount of soil for a seedling to grow in. Water is added through the top and drips onto the seedling below. Windows located on the front and back help drive carbon dioxide in and oxygen out. Made from transparent PolyJet material, it allows for sunlight penetration and easy viewing of the vegetables growth process. Once large enough, the plant can be transferred to a larger container outside and then harvested.
Industrial Designer - Devin Sidell
3D Printing and Contest Host - Fathom
Sponsors - SolidProfessor, GrabCad
The Grow Pod 2 has been designed to mimic nature in simplicity and complexity simultaneously. The resulting shape is not manufacturable without the help of 3D printing. I wanted the design to portray how delicate life is on Earth and how precious the foods we have are. If the Grow Pod 2 can make just one person keep their promise to eat well and maintain a healthy lifestyle, than the design is a success!
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
Tiny water supply and how do you 3D print clear objects?
Also, the water supply doesn't look to big.
These products are better.
Eco Cube C http://aquaponicsfilter.com/ Love the natural concept.
Tableau http://pikaplant.com/tableau/ Beautiful, yet practical.
and maybe, Connect a Pot http://www.desima.co/connectapot/ Flexible and fun
Surely the design & functionality of the grow pod could be achieved without 3D printing the entire thing, utilizing an incredibly expensive and non recyclable process? Or am I getting confused, and this purely served as a prototype before looking at other manufacturing techniques?
You can print in clear using polyjet printing. This print would cost a fortune from the amount of support material required. In the region of £2000
@ sam
The challenge was to create a design that could ONLY be 3D printed. https://grabcad.com/challenges/make-the-unmakeable-challenge-1
Its quite apparent this designer has done very little gardening / starting seeds indoors. It may satisfy an aesthetic criteria but fails where it matters.
Matt, it's quite apparent you didn't follow up on the GrabCad competition. Let me address your questions and concerns from a more realistic/logical point of view.
Nothing you said is realistic. I'm huge into gardening and have been starting my seeds indoors for the past 6 years. I did read the grabcad competition details. What I am critiquing is you product solution in relation to your product detail statement.
1. The project description at the top of the page says otherwise: “Water is added through the top and drips onto the seedling below”. If there is water sitting at the bottom then a cleaning solution is needed ( see #6)
2. I didn't say that the system is permanently a closed system but in the beginning the seedlings are enclosed. There are seed starting kits on the market that work pretty good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQNnmgB61jc. And your question about how seeds grow in the wild… you’re not going seeds in the wild, you’re growing in your kitchen, the variables are different, and the types of seeds being planted do not necessarily correspond to the area you live in. I have a watermelon patch growing in Calgary with success (harvested 3 melons so far) but with a lot of intervention.
3. Big Plants / Small plants doesn’t matter with the scale shown… and if you did increase the scale of the produce I don’t think the function would follow suit. There are plenty of home setups that would be much more efficient for the plants and in use of materials (additive or reductive)
4. No this isn’t irrelevant. You will have to transplant at some point with some plants. With the plastic or peat containers, the vessel is turned upside down and given a slight squeeze, pushing the seeding out of the container. This concept fails to address this.
5. Quit saying I’m not using reasonable logic… it’s just this product fails to address what it actually takes to grown a reasonable amount of food even for 1 person… I have a huge garden outside and microgreens inside, accounting for the loss from various sources (disease, pests, bad seeds, weather) I have enough for my wife and I.
6. You say pretty easily... so it would be easily shown / incorporated into your design. I do have running water I (and much of the serious gardeners) would not by this.
I can go all day. You can take this free advice and crush out a 2nd revision or you can continue peddling this feel good / do no good product.