TIL, in a 2008 New Yorker article (via Wikipedia of course), that "There are so many people with ideas about umbrellas that the Patent Office has four full-time examiners assessing their claims." Author Susan Orlean continues:
One of the problems, according to Ann Headley, the director of rain-product development for Totes [the largest umbrella company in the country], is that umbrellas are so ordinary that everyone thinks about them, and, because they're relatively simple, you don't need an advanced degree to imagine a way to redesign them, but it's difficult to come up with an umbrella idea that hasn't already been done.
Although I stopped short of diving into Class 135 of the ol' USPTO archive, the well-told product development saga served as a nice backgrounder on the umbrella in relation to a purportedly novel take on the very same. While Orlean's subject, artist/inventor Steve Hollinger, ended up licensing his umbrella to a toy company—patented in 2006, it doesn't seem to have made it into production—the "SA" has just launched on Kickstarter:
Sa is the latest non-watch project from Matthew Waldman of Nooka fame and is as futuristic as any product he has developed. He's taken young designer Justin Nagelberg under his wing, which, figuratively speaking, happens to be larger than the origami-inspired umbrella that the recent Hongik University grad has designed.Seeing as it's only a prototype at this point, commenters have expressed some concerns—but given Waldman's experience in the field, they've got a decent shot at making Sa (utility patent pending) a reality, if they reach their $30,000 funding goal by the December 1 deadline. Comments, of course, are welcome below.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
If they think this is such a great idea, they should shoulder the risk to bring it to market. It's not like they don't have the money to do it.
Someone could easily say.."I have a $5.00 umbrella at home and it works just fine, when it rains, which isn't everyday, so why spend $70.00 on a new one? The answer..."Because I wan't to support a creative entrepreneur that may develop even better products...one day". I'm not convinced this is a game changer in any respect. They need to go back to the drawing board and think about how soon to launch a product before its actually considered finished.
I won't be supporting the kickstarter, because it feels like they have completely jumped the gun taking it to kickstarter. They are essentially looking for development funds. They don't even have a functional prototype, but they are promising a delivery date in Mar 2015. Based on my kickstarter experience that isn't happening.