I come not to praise the Paleos, but to understand them.
Our story starts with the premise (which we will not unpack here, for reasons of brevity and taste) that running barefoot, or as close as possible to barefoot, is a more healthy means of locomoting. Under this premise, being immediately in tune with one's physical terrain is beneficial to the body and mind, requiring greater intentionality and physical dexterity in order to cover rough ground without injury. For those who cringe at the idea of walking barefoot to the mailbox, this might be a lost point, but the "natural running" school of thought has seen major conversion over the last ten years. While the overall claims seem understandable, there are some basic logistical difficulties with barefoot running. Namely, that the bottoms of feet are pretty smooth. This means that wet/uneven/slick surfaces can be dangerously low traction, and hard textured surfaces like rocky paths and concrete can chew you up after a while.
What to do, that won't deny naturalist runners the high levels of bio-feedback they crave? Designer/barefooted thinker Jörg Peitzker's answer: chainmail. Though "Paleo" brings to mind very little I'd associate with chainmail, the Paleo Barefoots are an interesting take on nekkid feet. The good: They provide traction, they're breathable, zero-drop, and minimal enough to conform to all the uncomfortable and delightful bumps and lumps of a trail. They also offer minimalist liners, paw-print styled sole pads to increase traction and better fit different environments, and can stave off archery attacks to your arches while LARPing. The odd: they're made of chainmail, not a material known for its ergonomic charm, so you're basically just putting snow chains on your feet.
A good application of unexpected material to niche need? A misapplication of minimalism? All I can think of is medievally shaped blisters, but I imagine my stylish high-viz trail-running shoes leave me well outside the target demographic.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
I just wanted to point out how wrong this comment is. People have been barefoot running for thousands of years. You don't barefoot run heel first, but with the ball of the foot. Look up the Tarahumara tribe or Kalahari tribe who run for hours barefoot. There's also a lot of research done by academics:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2010/01/nature_video_the_barefoot_prof.html
They proved excellent foot protection, at the same time give incredible barefoot simulation, which in turn allows me to relax and fully enjoy the beautiful countryside around me.
They are flexible, comfortable and extremely durable.
100% satisfied.
I've owned mine for almost two months and run the trails with them with no problems from stones or other items on the trail that had been a problem barefoot running unprotected.
I'm also an avid disc golfer and have found that while my round mates have hikers or trainers covered in mud that takes days to clean off I am able to swish through the next puddle and emerge with clean shoes.
As far as connectedness and stability I have yet to find a better solution than the paws application on my Anterra Sport version. They provide a cross terrain grip that is second to none.
The newer ultra paws are a more multi surface application.
These are quiet and move with me as I traverse sand, grass, clay, water, rock, and concrete all during the average round of play.
I have never had a blister from wearing them but I usually wear mine with the slipper socks.
Anything else you want to know email me knit4love(at)yahoo(dot)com
I agree with Steve Bailey's comments about comfort. They don't need to be tight fitting. In fact having some slack, while it takes some getting used to, is certainly not uncomfortable, and allows the toes to splay as they should. I find them infinitely better than any other minimalist shoe for muddy and wet and overgrown nature trails, and they have a better ground feel than any shoe I have tried.
I wore them for an 8 mile run the other day. My first run in them.
Totally amazing.
Quiet.
Smooth (the rings are circular and also circular in cross section so they are not sharp).
Grip like no other sole I have tried. Better than vivobarefoot and better than the mizuno trail shoes I wore before.
Don't knock it until you've tried it.
There are loads of positive reviews on the paleo barefoot website, no negative ones.
Stones don't get in.
Sand gets in and goes out again as quickly as it came in.
all in all, it looks like an impractical concept to me.
However, wearing shoes made out of the stuff would not be fun for any distance. You'd have to have an extremely tight, tailored fit, because if you don't then when it rubs, it is still metal and not cloth. And because it's metal it will dig into your skin, and will be quite uncomfortable.
Also because it has to be a tight fit in order to not chafe and rub as much as possible, you've kind of gotten rid of the perceived benefits of running barefoot. Because you're still wearing something that compresses your foot just like a sneaker.
One more thing: Being made of metal, they are quite slippery themselves and without the pads on the bottom they would be useless because your bare foot would be better. However they do have pads and so I don't think they are much better in that respect than any other "barefoot shoe."
To Tim: Have you worn these? How did you like them as compared to a different "barefoot shoe" or sneakers?