I consider your average sinkside soap dish a design failure. They either have no drainage, leaving the bar to sit in a puddle of water that transforms its underside into slime, or they drain into a container, and either way you have to empty the damn thing. The notion that this thing is designed to hold soap for you, yet you must constantly attend to it by draining it into the sink, is absurd. Oughtn't good industrial design free us from this minutiae?
A far better idea is this design for a slanted soap dish pictured up top. But Jeez Louise is it ugly. It looks like the bottom half of a mouth, with two fangs and a leering tongue.
That being said, it looks like it would get the job done, at least for certain types of sinks, and one variant of this design has a suction cup on the base so it doesn't tip over. (Both are made out of plastic, not porcelain, so it's probably too light to not tip over during use.)
Where the overall the shape came from is no mystery—the form clearly follows the function (the function being self-drainage). Which begs the question: What do you do when form follows function, and the result is freaking fugly?
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
I think this is great example of a from that not follows the function. I've spent a few hours designing a soap saver with a form that follows the function to a greater extent. http://en.bosign.se/soap_saver
If you were to describe this in functional terms, you'd have something like:
http://begthequestion.info/
I would agree wirh Corey, soap dispenser is the answer. If you are in a position to question the design of soap tray, you can surely afford a decent dispenser.
This just looks like an incomplete project. The engineering side is solved and sound, now the form needs some muscle relaxant and a few massages.
1/2 way there...
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=magnetic+soap+holder&safe=off&espv=2&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=OQWoU8aoL8-M0wWh1ICoAQ&ved=0CFYQsAQ&biw=1920&bih=971
However, the soap bar is cheaper, uses less packaging and takes up less space in transport. Still a pretty good option imho.
Is it really a problem at all? I have an in-wall soap dish with groove/tooth at the bottom, and it does the job well enough. Never had slime problem.
wrong.â€
― Richard Buckminster Fuller