When I look at schools, I walk into schools, when I interact with schools, I feel like they belong to a different universe. As soon as I set my foot in a school, it feels like I've stepped out of the real world and into a something alien and unnatural.
Most people call it an institution, in the same way that we call a hospital or a prison "an institution."
Institution—this says it all. A public or private place for the care or confinement of inmates, especially mental patients or other disabled or handicapped persons.
Throughout history, it seems like we've been dead set on designing educations and education facilities as to make the students feel locked-in, both body as well as soul.
It doesn't sound very inviting or inspiring, it normally doesn't look very inviting or inspring, and still we want students of all ages to spend a lot of time in these place, we want them to want to learn, to get inspired, to grow as human beings and to become the next generation when building our society. Yet hardly anything about the ordinary education facilities can be called inspiring, or showcase which direction we want our society to go.
For many years, one of of the questions roaming around in my mind on a daily basis has been, 'How can we create an good education that builds the sort of minds we want and need in our society, when we don't even seem to know which sort of society we want?' Which leads to: How can we go about re-arranging our education over and over and over again, without seemingly taking into account that education and society are undeniably intertwined?
This leads back to what I wrote in the very beginning: How come we have been designing institutions that separates, and in some cases, alienates, rather than intertwines education and education facilities with society? And how can we integrate education in such a way that it becomes a more natural, and less alien, base pillar of the society we want to create?
Is it just me, or is this something that we need to start a serious discussion about that crosses national, social and occupational borders...?
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
The points raised have been under discussion in the education domain/industry for quite a while.
This RSA animation (based on a TED talk) is a staple on changing the paradigm of education, from one of the greater minds in that domain, professor Ken Robinson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U
I went to University of Illinois - Chicago and we had a class that spanned two semesters our final year called Interdisciplinary Product Development. It wasn't as ingrained as what you are proposing within the art department, but we had to work with business and engineering students collaboratively on a project that was sponsored by an outside private company. I believe this was one of the more valuable classes we had to take.
What you are proposing makes even more sense. I think the collaboration happens on its own, but encouraging it would be more beneficial.
One of the things I loved about the ID program I attended was that the majority of our professors had day jobs - small businesses, consultancies, pet projects, or were on staff at other firms. It was very real because the people teaching us were living in reality.
Then you look at other professors that have been housed in academia for decades (esp social/political science, etc) and they have strong backwards opinions, are very closed-minded, and IMHO do not impart a real world feel to their students. This is the vast majority, as most are unionized, have tenure, and are paid handsomely.
I'd be more in favor of programs that entice employers to let their people go for a few months and work part time (for pay) in a university atmosphere every now and then. No unions, no benefits (employer would still hold the bag here), no red tape.