Like a lot of designers, I have struggled with the term industrial design over the years. The term seems a little vague. Sometimes people ask us if we design factories. A look at conversations over in the Core77 discussions forums shows I'm not alone. Check out this 80 reply thread on the forum that was started back in 2007. The term doesn't seem have the weight of history that Architecture has. It doesn't have the contemporary feel of the term Interaction Design. It does't have the specificity that some of our sub disciplines have like furniture design and footwear design, and it doesn't have the sexiness of transportation design or entertainment concept design.
In reaction we have flirted with other terms like product design, which has it's own set of issues. It seems a bit clinical to me and doesn't touch on the breadth of what we do beyond the product. Adding to the confusion, the term product design has been co-opted in some cases by mechanical engineers and app designers.
Over the last 15 years, as I've grown from a staff designer to a design director, creative director, and now chief design officer at Sound United, I've now started to come full circle. What I do now as a CDO of course involves identifying user segments, defining brand parameters, conceptualizing product opportunities, designing physical and digital products, packaging, web-experiences, physical retail and event spaces. It also involves designing interdisciplinary work flows, concept development processes, and organizational structures. Suddenly the term Industrial design seems to fit. Our education in user-centered design, problem identification, creative solution finding, implementation strategy mixed with our desire to often find the most aesthetic and clean solution makes us just as suited to designing the perfect ergonomic task chair as it does designing the company that makes the chair.
Industrial designers can in fact be designers of industry. So after 15 years of trying to dodge the term, I've actually come to embrace it. I am an industrial designer.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
I use the term product designer because it removes the technical associations and makes it easier to understand for people basically. 'Industrial Design' has this old, 2nd industrial revolution, dehumanized feel to it too. People used to be proud of having a technical sounding job title and degree from a technical school, but those days are over. I see manufacturing quickly shifting more from mass manufacturing to more localized and democratized production, and I'm already focusing a lot on designing for 3d printing. So for me the term product designer fits much better. The software guys just need to call themselves interactive designers. And when you combine interactive with product design you can call your role an 'interactive product designer'. But yeah if you focus solely on creating mass-produced items you should probably retain the term 'industrial designer'.
And unless an educational program is purely focused on mass-produced products, it should probably also start considering changing its name (I work freelance at Eindhoven University of Technology's dept. of Industrial Design and to just be completely honest, I despise the name and almost shiver everytime I hear it :) there's hardly any industrial design happening there really)
I have always related in conversations about this topic that people interact with the result of industrial designs efforts more than any single field or professional practice on earth. Then why is there still confusion over what we do. We can hold the blame on ourselves for not championing our profession, the associations that represent our field of practice, or our diversity of creativity.
The field of industrial design is broad, diverse, and uniquely impactful on an individual to international level simultaneously. We shape the experience of the environment that we live and work in, travel in, the experience of sitting, standing, laying, whapt we touch, how we touch or hold it, how if feels, the color, the texture, how it reacts to our interaction, there are so many things that could be added to this list, it is almost endless, because we haven't finished design things that we don't even know we need yet.
There are a lot of great places to get educated in the world for industrial design, but I'm sure the large majority will agree, that whatever specialty you chose to work in, it was not the only design education you got, that is what makes us special.
Michael, thanks for lifting this subject up again.
In my daily flow I do many things such as business strategy, brand strategy, organization structure, logistics, service design, operations management and project/product management. That is a lot of different job titles that I jump around in and what my title is isn't really a big concern to me. I am named Industrial Design Specialist because I am came on by making the CEO of our 400+ company say to my face, "I didn't realize I needed an Industrial Designer on my team". With that being said he didn't need someone to sketch or render concepts. He needed someone who displayed the type of thinking that we all naturally obtain.
To wrap it up I view it as an Industrial Designer is a type of person that brings their skills into other areas. An Industrial Designer works in business, product design, service design, UX/UI, marketing, branding, etc...
So I ask if we should really be trying to be another, "oh, oh, look at me, please look at me, we are awesome people" a me too mentality. Or should we drop the jealousy of looking at architecture and engineering as what we want to me and instead replace the work "creative"
I know it still exists as a profession on career postings but bare with me as I try to figure this out. haha
In the beginning designing products for the industrial revolution was a new cool profession. It's true that over the decade the term has lost his meaning. Nowadays the design world is very segmented in vertical specializations, and "product designers" describes better what a "product designer" does.
Industrial designer is a fine term in a lot of cases, but personally I think it heavily implies a focus on physical and technical design that can be confining. To a nuanced and informed audience, I think the terms industry or industrial can be understood in the broad contexts mentioned in the essay. But to the layperson or other professionals I think the term Product Designer can more effectively communicate the breadth of skills and roles we possess.
There is certainly the caveat that by using the term product design we lump ourselves in with many digital-exclusive designers, and the various engineer hybrids, who don't have the classic industrial design experience and expertise that makes us unique. Also, it could potentially section us off from non-product based design that we often take part in like brand strategy etc.
Right now for me, product design is more appealing because I think the mental image brought up amongst non-designers is probably more indicative of what we actually do than the factory-math-engineering ideas people often get from industrial design.
It's sure not perfect though. Next week I may switch back to preferring industrial design! We're an odd bunch to define.
I could definitely see C77 doing a series on the term, I would love to participate in that.
All the best to everyone this new year.