Earlier I griped about how the act of getting in and out of a car, a very basic automobile experience, is often neglected by designers. With the exception of the Tanto we looked at, there aren't many examples that demonstrate designers are really thinking about the problem and/or have the clout to address it.
Another lame car-based experience is the helicopter effect, a.k.a. "side window buffeting." You know the deal—you're driving at highway speeds when someone in the back cracks their window open, and suddenly your eardrums are assaulted with such a helicopter-rotor-like din that you can practically hear Wagner. Then you must open a window on the other side of the car to try to balance the effect. Or you can do what I do, which is to eject the offending passenger under a strict zero-tolerance policy for disturbing my automotive ecocsystem.
I warned you, dude
Two questions, and the first is: Why does this happen? Jalopnik asked physicist Dr. Stephen Granade to explain:
That "whum whum WHUM WHUM" noise happens because the wind passing over the small window opening... forms tiny tornadoes as it moves past the front edge of that opening. When those tornadoes, or vortices, reach the opening's back edge, they make a wave of pressure that pushes air into and out of the car. Since sound is nothing more than waves of pressure, this makes noise... The vortices keep pressing on the air in your car just at the right time to make big pressure waves that we can feel and hear.
The technical term for this effect is the Helmholtz resonance, though car people call it "side window buffeting"...
...As you drive faster, the rate at which the whums occur speed up and the loudness goes up.
Interestingly enough, Granade goes on to theorize that "It's more noticeable in modern cars because they're more aerodynamic," the thinking being that cracking a window is more disruptive to a smoothly-tuned airflow. If that's true, it would mean cars with boxy shapes would suffer less from Hemholtz resonance. Score another plus for the Tanto.
Second question: Why do you think this problem hasn't been addressed by design? Do you think designers simply don't have the juice to incorporate a manufacturable solution—or that no one cares?
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
Wind buffeting is a common trait of roadsters, which can only be culled by mounting a good wind deflector. I have retrofitted something calledBackblade windscreen on my drop top and now there's not even the slightest trace of wind swirls or draught noise in my cabin.
Yeah, the helicopter effect is rampant on most roadsters. It was almost unbearable on my ride. But after an additional draught-stop was mounted things calmed down. Thanks to the Zefferus wind deflector now my face and head don’t get whacked by the buffeting gust. Huh.
Yeah, Backblade wind deflector is
what I have affixed on my ride too. Until a draught-stop was mounted, the wind
noise and buffeting were too overwhelming that I was about to get rid of my
drop top. Now I can relish the al fresco cruises even on motorways.
PROBLEM NOW SOLVED with,
I thought that this effect was combated by the small plastic nodules found half way up the front windows?
I have no idea what they are called, just that they are missing from modern cars!
Cheers,
Mike
This refers to getting into the car as well. Probably the easiest way to get into a car seat is being able to walk into the car standing up and sit down on a chair. However, this would make a car idiotically larger than needed most of the time. Just measure the time you are getting into and out of the car and compare this to the time you are sitting in it. However, there are many models which offer easier access (tanto like models as the suzuki wagon R+, smaller pick up trucks, vans like the VW transporter), but these models have greatly reduced aerodynamics.
Multi billion projects like car models are managed to extremes to minimize mistakes. Combine this with over 100 years of global car design knowledge and I think calling these downsides of design choices "auto design fails" is a bit short-sighted.