Making business cards out of wood isn't new, and you can see a massive roundup of them here, but we like Wisconsin design student Staci Paul's mahogany-stained plywood take on them, below:
While some producers charge as much as $3 per wooden card, Paul managed to spend just $30 to produce 80 cards. Then again, as a student she has access to something many of us don't: A school-provided Versa Laser 300 machine.
This got me wondering: In gross terms, is making business cards out of wood rather than paper less green? I know the obvious answer seems like "yes," but I'm wondering if someone familiar with the ins and outs of papermaking can sound off in the comments. Specifically, I'm wondering about the trade-off between the chemicals involved in papermaking versus the (presumably) greater amount of raw wood required per card in the latter method.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
Why it's heavy on the enviroment, is because of the amount of energy and water needed for the process. When that is said, I'm not sure that small batches of laser cut buisness cards are better for the enviroment. Paper production is highly effective and It's quite possible you get more for the energy in paper production, vs. laser cutting.
Hard to calculate... Many factors to take into account, like the powerconsumption and enviromental impact of printing.
Sorry for the bad english, I'm danish
There are two issues I can see; the first being that they are a bit bulky. I tend to collect a few cards over the day, and one of these seems like it would be really bothersome to have in my pocket.
That brings me to my second point which is that some of these don't look very durable. In the first image especially, it looks like that card would split along the grain if I kept it in my pocket.
However, I do like @Ryan Spotowski's idea of using offcuts and other lumber waste.
The moral of my story is; sticking with a common species and a uncommonly used thickness made it cheaper. But as with any material, there are a plethora of options, and it was easy to see how you could spend two or three times as much as you would on paper if you're looking for something specific in terms of grain, thickness or touch (soft v. hard woods).