To anyone who pays an energy bill, harvesting free power from the sun sounds attractive. But solar remains prohibitively expensive, at least in the U.S. The up-front cost of the panels and the installation mean the overall savings take years or decades to accrue, which is too long for most homeowners.
A British company called Power Roll is in the process of disrupting this space. Their eponymous product is a film-like solar harvesting material that can be produced in rolls; their production method is closer to producing photographic film than building solar panels. And rather than relying on expensive rare-earth metals like indium, Power Roll's product uses widely-available perovskite, a mineral, as the "active ingredient" that turns sunlight into electricity.
The company says their manufacturing costs are inexpensive and scalable. Moreover, because the product is a film, the thinking is that installation will be far easier. Not just the roof, but every surface of a house could in theory be sheathed with the stuff.
That extra surface area might come in handy. An important component of solar harvesting materials is the PCE, or Power Conversion Efficiency rating, which is simply a measure of how much sun-borne energy hitting the panel actually gets converted into usable electricity. Traditional silicon-based solar panels have a PCE of 22% to 25%. Power Roll's product currently achieves just 12.8%. However, the company notes that the material is still under development and they expect to optimize it further.
Even with a PCE roughly half of the incumbent technology, if Power Roll's product is indeed low-cost, scalable, and easy to install, it would potentially have a gigantic impact on the solar market. "?In just one hour," the company writes, "enough sunlight hits the earth to power the whole world for a year…. We need to generate more solar energy. On more surfaces. In more places."
Here's the company's vision for how their product would be integrated into our environment:
Enter a caption (optional)
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
It is 4 days after this was posted, so I don't know if anyone will see my comment. I worked for 20 years towards flexible barrier technology for electronic devices, such as solar cells and OLED displays. The work towards the latter was successful and is now used for all OLED displays fabricated on flexible substrates. It is not something that can be ignored or delayed when developing these devices. They may have think that they have done the hard work, but they are still a long way from home. If they contact 3M for a flexible barrier film, they are likely to find that it costs a lot more than the photovoltaic film on a square meter basis. Another consideration is solar cell performance degrades as you scale up the process. It will take much work to attain their smaller scale numbers. Wishing them luck.