e
Do People Really Want Touch-Capacitive Human-Machine Interface Designs?
This unfortunate HMI will supposedly show up in cars
I'm trying not to write about negative things on here (you should see the things in my in-box), but I really dislike this new speculative HMI design called Pulsar. It's billed as a "Plastronics" system, which the developer defines as an "ultra-thin smart interface for interacting with the new generation of cars."
I believe I'd find using it deeply dissatisfying. See the video below and judge for yourself.
The Eurecat technology centre has developed a smart plastic surface just 3 millimetres thick which has an interface that allows users to interact and communicate with a machine, software or intuitive system with built-in LED lighting and capacitive sensors which is expected to be embedded in the central electronic control system of the new generation of cars.
"The need for digital transformation and the growing importance of design, integration, personalisation and standing out from the competition means the industry is constantly evolving and developing highly innovative products and services," says David Pardos, Head of Business Development in Eurecat's Mobility team. "By way of example, functional surfaces with haptic response activation featuring tactile sensations are gaining ground."
Are they gaining ground, and if so, why? Is this solving an end-user's problem, or a manufacturer's? Do people actually enjoy running their fingertips across plastic surfaces in vague swiping motions? When did we decide this was better than interacting with controls that actually provide tactile feedback?
This is technology for technology's sake. If I rented a car that had this for an interface, I'd exchange the car for another.
-
o1Favorite This
-
Q3Comment
Directory Company Profiles
Core77
Industrial Design
Resources
Industrial Design
Resources
-
Core77 Directory
Find the Best Industrial Design CompaniesGo -
Curve ID
Curve ID is a New York City based studio, offering a complete industrial design consultancy service....
-
HS Design
HSD believes the future is based on teamwork across many disciplines and collaboration with multiple...
-
WhipsawWhipsaw, under the leadership of design visionary Dan Harden, is a highly acclaimed strategy, indust...
-
Bluemap Design
BlueMap design is a multi-disciplinary product development firm. Founded by Simon Yan in 2001, the f...
-
Olivialand Studio
Olivialand Studio, founded by Olivia Blechschmidt, is a boutique industrial design consultancy that ...
-
RKS Design
RKS is an award-winning global product design firm and innovation consultancy specializing in indust...
-
Architectural Cladding & Roofing
Architectural Cladding & Roofing (ArcClad) are a New Zealand based firm specializing in roofing prod...
K
{Welcome
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
K
Reset Password
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
it's a cost savings since the electrical traces are essentially an in-mold decoration. this was presented over a decade ago as a cheaper alternative to touchscreens, with physical geometry to locate touch areas being ergonomically superior. also easier to clean than buttons or knobs
I absolutely hate the overhead capacitance switches for the interior lights in my new Prius. They're so hard to find, I had to add a tactile bump to find it in the dark. Stupid design. I've used touchscreens in cockpits & they are total distractions to use. Where. Is. It?
Have you noticed that physical switches are making a comeback?