Underground bike storage systems, like those seen in Japan, are amazing. But they obviously require a massive amount of excavation and construction.
A Swiss company called V-Locker has designed an easier-to-implement solution. The company has developed tower modules containing bike lockers that travel upwards in a paternoster-like arrangement.
Depending on the size of the tower, these can hold 6, 8, 12 or 20 bikes per unit, within a minimal footprint; 4.5 square meters, or 48 square feet, is all that's required.
A single door at the bottom is where riders can access the lockers (via app, of course). As a bonus, riders can also store their backpacks and helmets in the lockers, which are of course weatherproof.
The towers themselves are modular, making installation straightforward. The pieces are trucked to the site and stacked with a crane.
The exterior designs are customizable, in order to comply with any given municipality's visual regulations or tastes.
This is no mere concept, by the way; there are currently six of these located through Switzerland and seven in Germany, with more to come.
The design and engineering for these was done by consultancy Meyer-Hayoz.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
Bicycles are awkward objects to store, not only in context but in the limited space available to them on trains and in hallways.
Paying someone to guard a bike rack sounds a lot cheaper than any of this.
Minimum wage in Zurich where the company is based is 23.90 CHF/hour (1 CHF is about $1.10). To pay someone to watch the bike rack around the clock would cost more than $280,000 in wages alone. And it wouldn't be nearly as useful or effective as a secure bike locker.
1- How does the cost per storage bay compare to the Japanese design? Seems like these are more expensive as every 6 bikes require a new waterproof structure, control system, etc…
Ebikes can easily cost over $5,000 and only the very top end locks can stand up to a $100 battery powered angle grinder. This solution doesn't seem entirely unreasonable to me.
1. The expense is a drop in the ocean compared to the amount expended on storing cars for the 95% of the time they are not in use.
So an expensive 30ft tall tower that holds 6 bikes??? Yeah, this is not the solution.....
"So an expensive 30ft tall tower that holds 6 bikes???”
I'm not sure why you think the volume of a car is relevant, unless you're planning on stacking them up.
"I'm not sure why you think the volume of a car is relevant, unless you're planning on stacking them up." Did you seriously ask that question with a picture of stacked car parking in the background??? Quite possibly the most common type of car parking lots are stacked!!
Ok, holds 6 bike and is 23f tall...... it's also prone to electrical failures and vandalism.
I got curious and ran the numbers.
Goddamn the expenses we go to satiate middle class crime paranoia...
Yeah, the usual approach is to have middle class people drive to work, and have the emissions from their cars reduce the life expectancy of lower income families who live in the cheap housing near the main roads. /s