AP photographer Mannie Garcia takes a photo of Obama on the campaign trail. Artist Shepard Fairey turns the image into a poster, and gets the pants sued off of him by AP. Then Garcia says he has the rights to the image, not AP, but that he's happy the photo was turned into the poster.
Ohmygod so like, I talked to Helen in gym, and like she totally said that Tony was staring at her in Biology. But I told her there's no way that could be true, 'cause like Tony totally knows Neil is into Helen, and Tony and Neil are friends, and Sandra sits behind Helen and I think Tony was just staring at Sandra!
Anyways.
Writes Steven Heller (of the Daily Heller) on the Garcia/Fairey/AP thing:
...I do want to point out that this is not the first time photographs (and other artworks) have been the raw material for graphic works. In fact, the already murky area called "fair use," which Fairey's lawyers are invoking, has been applied before. [Here] are a few that have passed that very test. (Che by Alberto Korda and Paul Davis; Nixon official photo and Andy Warhol; Mao official portrait and Andy Warhol; News photo of Sacco and Vanzetti and Ben Shahn; Michelangelo's Isaiah and Norman Rockwell's Rosie the Riveter.)
So...what do you think?
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
Lawyers could make better use of their time, but hey, times are hard. Poor lambs. The AP's lawyers are particularly special idiots for not checking their own contracts, which is what I thought lawyers were there for in the first place.
The law is the law, so I'm not saying that it should bow to the whim of any disgusted designer (and I'll throw myself into that category for fairness) to serve their own purpose...that'd be hypocritical. But I will say that if he gets hammered, it was coming his way for a long time.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aLD3ob_Bd1Oc&refer=us