In 2003, the Japanese municipality of Kamikatsu declared their intention to become a Zero-Waste Town. While true zero-waste is impossible, 20 years later the town has reached an impressive 80% recycling rate. (The national average in Japan is just 20%; in America, single digits.)
Kamikatsu has achieved this rate by studying garbage, and determining that there are 13 categories and 45 subcategories of waste. The town (population roughly 1,400) has no garbage trucks. Instead, residents bring their garbage to the town's Zero Waste Center, and separate it themselves at different stations that correspond with each of the waste categories.
The Zero Waste Center, a question-mark-shaped structure designed by architect Hiroshi Nakamura, was itself designed with low waste in mind. The façade is made of wood offcuts and features hundreds of windows donated by the community. The flooring is made from recycled glass, and a number of the fixtures were taken from abandoned buildings.
I was curious what taxonomy of garbage the town developed, so I parsed a machine translation of the town's Japanese-language garbage guidebook. (This being Japan, the guidebook is hilariously populated by Power-Rangers-like illustrations.)
Translation: "If you're not sure how to sort your waste, you can ask a worker at the Center."
Translation: "You don't have to sort everything perfectly at home; you can sort it here at the Center."
Here are Kamikatsu's 13 categories and 45 subcategories of waste:
Any non-food product that still has life in it (clothing, household goods, functioning appliances, books, etc.) can be brought to the facility's Kurukuru ("come and go") Shop. There the object is weighed and recorded, then it goes on display.
Only Kamikatsu residents are allowed to donate these objects, but anyone can take them for free, including non-residents. When an object is taken, it's again weighed and recorded.
"It's fun," the town's garbage guide reads, "to stop by to see if there's anything you can find while taking out the trash."
As for why everything gets weighed coming in and going out, well, the Japanese like their statistics:
Translation: "Usage results last year: 4,572kg brought in, 4,736kg taken home."
Food garbage isn't allowed. "Compost food scraps," the guide reads. "It's the only resource you can recycle yourself." The town recommends residents use compost bins, electric composters (which the town offers purchase assistance for) or Bamboo Chip composters, a Japanese invention I'll write about in another post.
Businesses, meanwhile, are encourage to use larger electric composters.
So those are the first two categories. Everything else is brought to one of the sorting stations within the facility. Some of the recyclable items return deposits, while others cost the town money to recycle. To educate the townspeople, these categories are denoted in the guidebook with icons: A piggy bank or treasure chest for items that return deposits, and a currency bill flying away for items that cost money to recycle or dispose of.
The following four categories are recyclable, and can generate money.
The two items on the left, with red X's, are: Cardboard lined with gold or silver foil (often used in gift boxes), and dog food bags. These belong in subcategory 4-9.
The three banned items: Stiff paper cores, which go to 4-7; Paper beverage cartons, which goes to 4-4; and thermal paper like receipts, which go to 4-9.
The plastic spouts must be cut out, and sent to subcategory 7-4; the cartons must be cut open, flattened, and cleaned of any residue inside.
These must be cut open and flattened, and cleaned of any residue inside.
Acidic or alcoholic beverage containers have different linings and thus go into a different subcategory. These must also be cut open, flattened, and cleaned of any residue inside.
Must be kept in a bag so it does not scatter.
Receipts, dog food bags, detergent boxes, printed photographs, used tissues, etc. cannot be recycled and are burned as fuel.
If it's not going into the Kurukuru Store, it goes here. It's either sold secondhand in Japan or overseas, or recycled into other clothing. If it's really dirty, it belongs in subcategory 5-2.
Very dirty garments and unrecyclable fabrics are burned as fuel.
These are burned as fuel.
Must be kept in a vessel. It is recycled into feed, soap, or fuel.
Thanks to Japanese law, the items in these next two categories must be recycled by the manufacturer. Even still, some of these do incur a fee.
These are burned as fuel.
It has to be white and it has to be clean, and then it can be recycled into more food packaging.
The caps and labels must be removed, then these will be recycled, possibly into clothing. If the bottles are cut or dirty, they go to 7-2.
These will be recycled by the manufacturer.
These will be recycled by the manufacturer into more glass bottles and jars.
These will be recycled by the manufacturer into more glass bottles and jars.
These will be recycled by the manufacturer.
These return a deposit. As far as I can tell, they are washed and reused by the manufacturer.
The Japanese are safety-minded, and anything that could cause harm to a worker—like glass or ceramic vessels or bulbs that could shatter, mercury thermometers, batteries that could explode, etc.—fall into this category. Luckily, recycling these objects does return fees.
Will be recycled into asphalt.
Will be recycled (into what is not mentioned).
Will be recycled into glassware.
Will be recycled, possibly into steel products.
Will be recycled, possibly into lead.
Will be recycled, possibly into steel products.
Bicycles, galvanized panels, agricultural machinery, spring mattresses, etc. Will be recycled into other metals.
Will be burned for fuel.
Will be burned for fuel (except carpets, which go into 10-4).
PVC, rubber, hoses, rugs, etc. are incinerated.
The following two categories cannot be recycled, and cost money to dispose of.
Rubber bands, PVC raincoats, footwear, facemasks, leather gloves, rubber gloves, dirty tissues, etc. are incinerated.
These items—dirty diapers, menstrual products, pee pads, etc.--suffer the same fate as 11.1, but for obvious reasons are placed in a different container.
Seashells, nail polish, chemical hand warmers, glass and metal that are irreparably dirty, plastic and metal that has been joined and cannot be separated.
These are burned for fuel.
The documentation is not clear on what happens to these.
Residents must pay a specialty company that will recycle the appliance in accordance with Japanese regulations.
So that's the end of the list. As you can see, it's a pretty comprehensive breakdown, and even still, there's another 20% to go before they could become truly zero-waste. The town reckons that, since their citizens are already going all-out in waste sorting, the remaining 20% would need to be solved by manufacturers and not consumers. Which I imagine would require legislation, as no for-profit company would willingly up-end their own cost structure, not in today's short-term business climate.
In the meantime, Kamikatsu invites visitors from around the world to observe and learn about their garbage collection methods; the dot in the question mark is actually a hotel.
Lastly, here's a video demonstrating their processes, with explanations from Akira Sakano, the director of Kamikatsu's Zero Waste Academy:
Enter a caption (optional)
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
The most important take away from this complexity is that it will always be better, easier, and cheaper to reduce and reuse. More durable goods consumer goods and less/resuable packaging will result in lower energy and materials costs overall for far less effort than recycling ever will.
This project really brings home how unprepared we are to undo the mess. My first thought was that a bring system to a building on a hill was not ideal. But I guess it's better than having 13 collection trucks sent round to collect from the kerbside, and then a number of full-time operatives to do the final sorting. For one small town? It's a good thing it was tried first on this small scale.
In my local area of the UK, population 570,000, we have had a collection service for about twenty years. I am not aware that anything has changed during that time. It has kind of bedded-in over the years, and the focus has moved to other problems. There were complaints at first that many people had no room to store the three large, heavy bags (made entirely of plastic of course) but I think those people have just resigned themselves to continuing to fill their large plastic wheeled bins, the contents of which go to the new 'state of the art' incinerator in the centre of the area.
With all the dedication I have applied to sorting my waste, over these twenty years (and the twenty before that when it was all to be taken to large painted skips at the supermarket) I still struggle to decide whether a particular item is recyclable or not. And even if it is recyclable, is that necessarily better than consigning it to the incinerator? In the sense of a full product life-cycle analysis. I think the answer would be different for every single item. And it is doubtful you could find anyone who could confidently & honestly give a yes or no answer, no matter how in-depth their education and experience.
There is a financial incentive incentive for those gaining from the provision of recycling services to ask no questions. And should they nevertheless do so out of personal interest, they would be hard pressed to find reliable answers.
So I think the shape of this building in this small town in Japan, really is appropriate.