Detroit-based Sundberg-Ferar is an industrial design, research, engineering, innovation strategy and prototyping firm. They undertook the following thought exercise: How could robots—sorry, "cobots"—make a positive impact on the food industry?
So far, the emerging role of cobots (collaborative robots) in the food industry is only as broad as jobs which are dirty, dull, or dangerous. In this ideation activity Sundberg-Ferar explored ways to maximize the collaborative potential of cobots in food workplaces by envisioning solutions that don't merely diminish human risk, but enable humans to reach new heights of aspirational fulfillment by focusing on the parts of their work that are most meaningful and "human".
In this ideation exercise, we pursued 6 lines of thinking at a high-level on the topic of cobots in the food industry. This brief exploration resulted in the creation of imagery to visualize ideals for the future of cobot design and use-cases.
We elaborate on each of these lines of thinking in the white paper "Cobots and the Future of Food: 6 Considerations for Cobot Design"
Get the white paper
Where is that sweet spot where humans and robots meet their respective limitations and cross over to relying on each other as their individual strengths and weaknesses become complimentary?
What more might we do to create a cobot experience for human workers that they enjoy, and benefit from, and that results in more than the sum of its parts?
In the near-term, how might we find a more intuitive process for humans and robots to communicate with each other through non-verbals and body language; both necessary cues to be able to move harmoniously at speed?
In the future, how might we create true collaboration which transforms a cobot from a job-taker and a headache to an esteemed co-worker who augments and empowers the creative work of the team?
How might we create cobot capabilities that lend themselves not only to back-of-the-house logistics but also to front-of-the-house assistance, convenience, and entertainment?
Could the novelty of cobots combined with the art of live cooking be leveraged to create new opportunities for business growth?
How can we develop cobot architectures for food service or restaurants that demystify the role and function of the cobot to create trust?
How might we use cobots to execute tasks like hearing, translating, seeing, lifting etc?
How might we use cobots to enable people who are passionate about food to pursue their passion regardless of physical limitations?
How might we create cobots that don't merely execute a task, but execute it with their own flair created by their unique capabilities?
How might we create robots that can assist with culinary arts at a highly skilled level, complementing the unique style of an individual chef of cook, and helping artists realize their vision?
Mitigating these issues is a good start, but merely creating a cobot that avoids human injury or impediment is a far cry from a cobot that helps, can anticipate, and empowers their human co-workers.
Excerpt from "Cobots and the Future of Food: 6 Considerations for Cobot Design"
Academic research and industry players assert that the outcomes of cobot and human relationships are dependent on the limits of understanding between humans and robots. Today these relationships are often characterized by stress, distrust, and miscommunication, the opposite of what is needed for collaboration. One source of this distrust and fear is the sense that human workers are being made redundant. Another is the learning curve required of human workers to train the robot, explain in its language what to do, and find a new way of working that accommodates the robot. This ideation exercise is meant to provoke thought and action around the idea of putting increasing emphasis on cobots understanding and aligning to humans, rather than asking humans to cross the gap of understanding.
The best food cobot companies are succeeding in one or more of the areas we've talked about above. To dominate the industry, designers and users of collaborative robots must achieve solutions that create a desired and beneficial experience for human workers. Failure in this will only result in a frustrated and unproductive workforce. Success will mean greater heights of human innovation, creativity, productivity, and business growth than we've ever seen before.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
It's an interesting discussion - should the role of robotics be to replace the worker or augment them? There are many jobs that are extremely hazardous that I see as being prime candidates for 'replacing' humans. But, someone will be out of a job.
I like to see people searching for creative solutions to problems, but I don't see cobots as solutions to most problems encountered in a commercial kitchen. It really stuck with me when I heard someone say that a robot's place is when a job is dull, dirty, or dangerous. Lots of us love to cook and lots of people make fulfilling careers out of it. We shouldn't be sending fulfilling creative jobs to robots or Ai. As a design community we need to be careful what we suggest the future should look like.
I remember when I was going to China for work frequently I would typically jog different paths through Zhuhai. I'm not sure if this is still the case, but almost every morning I would see people manually sweeping the streets. I asked one of our local manufacturing liaisons, Lois, why the city didn't use mechanical street sweepers and he said "Michael, we have over a billion people, we don't need machines, we need jobs"... it was an enlightening response. Coming from the US, I don't think it would have ever dawned on me to think that way. Looking at this post I find myself thinking of what Lois said. Think of a show like The Bear and how many skilled people work in that kitchen that just makes sandwiches. Before embarking on this should we ask ourselves if we want to reduce that by 50%? ... or maybe effectively this would just become the back room at McDonalds... they are already replacing cashiers with touch screens (McDonalds cashier was my very first job BTW). I'm not sure what is the right path forward here but I do think it deserves consideration.