It's not that we dislike having smaller, sleeker objects, but with Apple's announcement yesterday of new laptops, we couldn't help but notice how small the visual difference is between this generation and the last. Why? Because as objects get "tighter," well, there's simply less to design. Everything goes into the details; broad design strokes seem to fade in importance.
To see what we mean, hit the jump and take a look at these older Apple products, manufactured during a time when there was still enough meat on the product to hang some design onto, so to speak.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
I'm happy to see my photos here and would have given you the okay to do so - especially considering the content of the article - but these are ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You should have asked first.
[Ed: We apologize for the oversight and have graciously been given permission by the photographer.]
The new Macbooks are nothing short of revolutionary for me! Not in terms of design aesthetics but in terms of production process. Milling has been around for a while (for rapid prototyping, tooling, rims etc.) but this is the first time it is done for consumer electronics!
Apple now needs far fewer molds and can more easily & rapidly incorporate changes. And if each Macbook is milled you could theoretically have a really customized part! Imagine uploading a design and getting it milled.
People have been talking about it for ages and Apple just took the first step!
Forget the laptops and desktops. The real extreme here is their iPhone and similar competitor products, right?
Alternatively, is having less material to design against, also mean that there are just harder design decisions to make? But the same number of decisions/elements are still possible?