e
Palin's frames
The recent spate of press coverage and blog twitters about Sarah Palin's 704 series Kazuo Kawasaki designed titanium frames brings to mind an old saying, "The clothes make the man." So, does it also follow that that "The eyewear makes the woman?" Or we could expand our theory somewhat and ask if "The eyewear makes the woman qualified?"
As Palin and her supports labor to shore up the vice-presidential candidate's credentials for the job against what some say is significant evidence to the contrary, it is curious that so much attention is given to her choice of eyewear. It is hardly surprising for the press to analyze the sartorial selections of female politicians--we are just now recovering from the intense scrutiny of Hillary Clinton's pantsuits, and who could forget Condaleezza's "boot-gate"?--yet glasses, a small though arguably functional accessory, seem insignificant by comparison. However, their relative contribution to a larger "ensemble" belies the unique and transformative power of glasses on women. They have a semiotic charge that can simultaneously de-sex (remember Dorothy Parker's famous couplet, "Men don't make passes/at girls who wear glasses") and empower. If you buy into the vernacular of popular culture, then you will easily recognize that dowdy, intelligent woman wearing glasses in the classic Hollywood film, who will (before the credits roll) let her hair down, take off her glasses and transform into a sexy vixen who finds satisfaction and fulfillment in love (read: sex). If we follow that line of logic backwards, we can return the starlet to her un-sexy, intellectually respectable identity, by sweeping her hair back up and putting on the glasses.
So perhaps the 704 series Kawasaki frames are Palin's way of dethroning her old beauty queen persona and of adding a layer of studious authority to all those close-ups. Or maybe she just doesn't like contacts. Either way, like Clinton's pantsuits they are signifiers and not qualifiers, and we would much rather know about Palin's plans for bringing health care to the uninsured than how many pairs of glasses she owns.
-
oFavorite This
-
Q11Comment
Directory Company Profiles
Core77
Industrial Design
Resources
Industrial Design
Resources
-
Core77 Directory
Find the Best Industrial Design CompaniesGo -
A2
A2 is a product development consultancy focused on design strategy, market and user research, indust...
-
The Metcalfe Group, Inc.
Located in the greater Cleveland, Ohio area, we are an experienced full-service product design firm ...
-
Design 1st Inc.
Hardware product design is a high risk business - unless you have a design partner who has done it s...
-
studioFAR
Established in 2009, studioFAR is a softgoods design firm based in the Mission district of San Franc...
-
Shark DesignShark Design is a full service product development company with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen (Chin...
-
andesignlab
ANDESIGN is an industrial design consultancy based in Orange County California and Austin Texas. AN...
-
GEARNEED
We are a highly specialized group of Industrial Designers with 30 years of experience bringing over ...
K
{Welcome
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
K
Reset Password
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
"Simply treat him as Palin's equal, in which case you cannot deny his vast shortcomings of experience and extremely questionable judgement."
Ignoring the point about a white man calling a black man arrogant, and the historical baggage associated with that choice of words, the statement above is absolutely astounding. If you didn't get a chance to see her interview with the hard-edged Katie Couric, here's one short outtake where Palin demonstrates her command over US foreign policy, that sums up her experience and judgement nicely.
Now, she's not running against Obama directly, so we really shouldn't be comparing the two anyway.
If anything Palin is the most arrogant of the four, whose unfettered hubris underlines a complete absence of rationalism and logic. If you want proof of that, please watch her interview with Charles Gibson on her lackluster knowledge of the Bush Doctrine, or the Couric interview where she fails to give specific examples of her so-called "foreign policy experience."
It's quite racist in my opinion, to do anything but treat him as simply a man. By doing otherwise, you make Obama the single greatest success of Affirmative Action. Which is indeed veiled racism in that a minority would need our (white fat bald rich men's) help to get anywhere.
Simply treat him as Palin's equal, in which case you cannot deny his vast shortcomings of experience and extremely questionable judgement.
Seems to me that this quote seems quite overtly sexist, even by the women in my office:
"Although I would not be surprised if they were non-prescription lenses, worn merely as a prop to distance her from her beauty queen days! "
While this post may or may not belong at Core77, you can't debate the design of glasses without getting caught up in the impact they have on your perception of the person wearing the frames. Given that she is a woman, and the public and press are much more sensitive to the appearances of women vs. men, could you imagine the skewering she'd get if she were sporting some old, out-of-fashion frames?
At least she's been wearing these particular frames for a while, as far as I can tell, and they are not a recent addition in an attempt to present her as scholarly or professional. Although I would not be surprised if they were non-prescription lenses, worn merely as a prop to distance her from her beauty queen days!
I thought the take was quite impartial. Perhaps a little lacking in design content. But it is an interesting dichotomy that so much can be made of the female attire and so little to her views and qualifications. This is an aesthetic consideration that is highly relevant to design thinking.
Geez, it's not like Margaret brought up the fact that Palin thinks humans co-existed with dinosaurs or that she believes that G.d is speaking directly too her and appointing her to protect the country from the evil devils infiltrating our schools or even that Palin wants to look through those stylish Kawasaki's as she focuses the sights of our nuclear armaments on Iran and Russia. Now those kinds of comments would just be plain fighting words worthy of your indignant comment (all true but still...)
Why not focus on Design, the reason Core77 exists, and leave the amateurish dilletante political tripe for the View or Us Weekly?
Besides...hold Obama's resume up to hers. He's less experienced than she, and he's running for the top job. At least she's not that arrogant and will learn a lot before having a chance to ruin our country.