One of the smartest conventions urban planners have adopted in recent years is protecting bike lanes with rows of parked cars. It increases both safety and bicycle uptake. However, here's a prime example of how good design can be undone by a lack of coordination and communication.
In downtown Los Angeles, a protected bike lane was recently added--along a stretch of Grand Avenue that already had curbside EV charging stations installed. That has resulted in this incredibly foolhardy arrangement, spotted by Reddit user TezzDonut:
On the thread, fellow Redditor and good Samaritan maskdmirag wrote "Thanks for the post and the location, I got this to the attention of some people who run the car charger program and will get it moved."
Good on him, but the question is, move it how?
What is your suggested fix for this situation, assuming we'd like to keep both the protected bike lane and the EV charging station? My first thought (assuming digging into the asphalt and/or physically moving the post is untenable) was an overhead lamppost-type object that suspends the cable and hangs it down closer to where it needs to go, but I realize that brings a host of new problems. Am hoping one of you can do better.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
A Dutch solution - recess the cable. Tiles across the pavement (sorry sidewalk) with a groove for the cable and rubber to level it.
A Dutch solution - recess the cable. Tiles across the pavement (sorry, sidewalk) and cycle path with a groove cut out for the cable and rubber to level it.
The cable could simply be lengthened so it always lies flat across bike lane when in use. At worst it's then a small bump to ride over. It should also be daubed with fluorescent paint. The groove in the tarmac idea is nice but it would require installing a post within the car parking area to hold the cable, so there would be some loss of space for the car.
And furthermore, what makes you think that is a bike lane? Two thick stripes with a chevron? Why is there an interior stripe? Are bikes forbidden to ride in the gutter?
I live in California. Bike lanes have one stripe, or two, or their green painted (very slippery when wet), and they are routed to expose cyclists to the most dangerous traffic conditions. Cross hatches? Why?
Why can't I park my car in that space between the interior line and the sidewalk?
I think we should consider putting fuel tanks in vehicles so that they can venture into urban areas without the need for messy cord.
In reality, this kind of mistake occurs all the time because modern civic improvement is all political and grant driven from above. There are competing grants for charging stations, bike lanes, wildlife crossings, wheelchair ramps, and so on. Each with its own constituency. In the community where I live, we have wheelchair ramps that expose pedestrians and property to errant vehicles (because there is no curb between street and sidewalk), and ramps that lead to -- literally -- nowhere.
If there was any actual planning going on in local communities, these kinds of things would not happen. But there is not. City staff just responds to where the money is available "from above". It's a matter of survival.
All I think when I see electric cars and rear view cameras is, "how well is this going to work after freezing rain, a foot of snow in -26°C." I'm sure it will all work great.
(The rubber flap is open on one side to allow you to lay the cable down, and retrieve it later.)