It's crazy that you're reading this on something that has more technology than the Apollo 11 mission computers, yet you store your clothes in an object whose form factor was designed several centuries ago. The chest of drawers is a completely outdated piece of furniture, yet it is something nearly all of us own, and among the first things people buy when setting up their first apartment.
First off, think of how poor the functionality of your standard dresser is:
You take your freshly-laundered clothes, fold them, and place them in stacks within the drawers. This is the dumbest way to store a collection of items you may want to browse through. There's a reason that file cabinets are designed to store documents vertically; imagine digging through a horizontal stack of paper to find the one you want.
You go to your dresser to retrieve a particular item of clothing. Unless the target item is right on top, you must root through your stack of clothing. Do you take the time to neaten up the stack each time you retrieve something from the bottom?
I'm guessing most of us follow the established order of:
Top Drawers - Underwear & Socks
Middle Drawers - Tops
Bottom Drawers - Pants & Bottoms
Even still, it would be more convenient to see precisely what's within each drawer.
I've seen a number of these over the years, but this is the handsomest I've come across.
Being designed for a retail environment, efficiency is key, and thus it features the window-fronted drawers that all haberdashery cabinets have.
This one, however, is a midcentury piece, and the windows have been framed within a racetrack-shaped aperture in the drawer face.
It's a damn sight better looking than the rail-and-stile construction of the average glass-fronted haberdashery cabinet drawer face.
It is also, of course, more wasteful. Consider that the rail-and-stile economically uses thin strips of wood, which could conceivably even be offcuts.
Meanwhile the one pictured here has a singular piece of wood with the racetrack cut out of it. I reckon 75% or more of each drawer face ends up in the burn pile.
But it does address each of the three problems mentioned above. You would easily be able to see what's within each drawer, and swiftly retrieve the item you wanted.
It's not a perfect design, of course. We can see here that glare could be an issue.
Not to mention that if had one of these and used it the way I'd prefer to, which is storing a single item within each drawer, that's not exactly space-efficient. This unit here measures 69 inches high, 84 inches wide and 22.5 inches deep.
While the manufacturer is unknown, they obviously took pride in their work and paid attention to detail. Note the "clocked" screws on the handles, each arranged with their slot vertical.
As for why clothing dressers don't look like this, the answer is obvious: It would be way too expensive to make them this way, from both a labor and materials perspective.
Speaking of cost, this model was up on eBay in the UK and sold for £2,995 (about USD $3,920).
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
It puts to shame that terribly built (and terribly expensive) show display you wrote about a few years(?) back. I can only hope the interior waste of those drawer fronts went to drawer pulls or something on another project.
I was thinking about how the waste might have been used, but in a production environment, I doubt there was a good way. Consider how you'd remove the racetrack and have a clean leftover piece to work with; I'm thinking there's no way the factory would take the time to drill a hole and remove/install a blade to scroll-saw it out. If they had handheld power jigsaws back then, maybe, as I doubt they'd set a man on manually jab-sawing it. If they were to route around the profile (they had routers back then), they'd have the hazard of the racetrack piece flying around when the cut was complete, so that's out. My guess is that the entire shape was milled into sawdust (though I admittedly have no proof).
I do this kind of racetrack inset on my guitar amplifier cabinets all the time. I cut the center out (1/2" Baltic Birch ply) roughly with a jigsaw, then attach a MDF template and finish the rout with a straight pattern bit on my router table. Not incredibly efficient, but to get this look that's the way to go (barring CNC). I use the leftover center waste for cleats, jigs, etc. Once the cabinet is glued up with the racetrack inset, I round over the racetrack on the router table.
I think the only way I'd make the race track version would be if I could make the oval cut out the size of my table saw clearance plate. Even then, most likely ply w/veneer faces :/
Emily, out of curiosity, what tools/methods would you use to cut the shape out and keep the racetrack center intact?
Okay, maybe not years, fatherhood has addled my brainclock.
http://www.core77.com/posts/43306/A-Luxury-Shoe-Storage-System%E2%80%94With-Some-Puzzling-Craftsmanship-Issues
Okahttp://www.core77.com/posts/43306/A-Luxury-Shoe-Storage-System%E2%80%94With-Some-Puzzling-Craftsmanship-Issues y, maybe not years. Fatherhood has addled my brainclock.