Core77

Game-Changing Product Design: Small L16 Camera Replaces an SLR and a Bag Full of Lenses

Diminutive device, disruptive design

By Rain Noe - October 9, 2015

in Photography | Crowdfunding

Market research shows that 50% of folks who own an SLR camera no longer use it. It's simply too bulky to carry around, especially with a full complement of lenses, and most of us find it more convenient to shoot with our phones.

Enter brilliant inventor Rajiv Laroia, who stopped carrying his SLR for the reason mentioned above. Laroia observed that tiny, smartphone-sized camera lenses were becoming more and more affordable, and he then spent nine months studying optics to design a camera that would incorporate them. The result is the Light L16 camera, which incorporates 16 lenses, each with their own sensor, and fires 10 of them with every shot.

Courtesy: Light (http://light.co/)

After capturing light from ten "cameras" at once--the company refers to each lense/sensor as its own camera--the device uses software to crunch that information into a single photo, which the user can tweak during processing, changing the aperture after-the-fact. This means that as with the Lytro, one can alter the depth of focus after the image has already been shot--for example, bringing a person in frame into sharp focus while blurring the background behind them.

The Light Story from light on Vimeo.

Here's a closer look at how the camera is constructed, and some of the back story:

Enter a caption (optional)

It took two years to get Light, Laroia's company, up and running and with funding behind it. They've just signed a production deal with Foxconn and the product will begin shipping in 2016.

Perhaps most amazing is the price: The folks at Light reckon the camera replaces $6,000 worth of SLR lenses, while costing only $1,699—and they're knocking $400 off of the price for those who pre-order. You can just picture the panicky meetings being called at SLR and lens manufacturers around the world.

o
1

Favorite This
Q
7

Comment

Comments

Ryan White

9 years ago

Z

1Z

Reply

While this is an interesting idea, in the first minute they seem to totally miss the point...people don't take pictures with their phone because it's a convenient form factor, they take pictures with it because it's the single device they HAVE to carry in order to do so.

!Report as spam
- Ryan Hume
  
  Ryan White
  
  9 years ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  spot on - nobody wants to carry a second device. And I second the earlier question about shutter speed
  
  !Report as spam
Eitan Mendelowitz

9 years ago

Z

1Z

Reply

My big question about this camera and technology is the shutter lag. I'm sure it take nice hi-res images with a great variety of DOF but I can't find any mention of frame rates or delays. Lower shutter lag is the main reason I use a D-SLR over a phone camera.

!Report as spam
Sean Horita

9 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Who did the I.D.? Internal or consultants?

!Report as spam
- Anson Cheung
  
  Sean Horita
  
  9 years ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  ID was done by Bould Design (www.bould.com)
  
  !Report as spam
Bobby Hranichny (ran-itch-knee)

9 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

I think it would be fine for $600. or so but at this price point you can get a small crossover that does amazing video.

!Report as spam
Mike Brannon

9 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Brilliant! This is the future. And apparently the present, too.

!Report as spam