DesignCrowd is the name of a graphic design crowdsourcing venture that bills themselves as "The world's #1 custom design marketplace." Businesses seeking designs for logos, websites, T-shirts, flyers, brochures or business cards submit design briefs, then the site's 133,000-plus designers submit concepts; DC estimates that concepts start rolling in within hours of posting a brief, and that they will typically add up to over 100 submissions per project. Businesses can then request changes of their selectees, and eventually money changes hands. The cynical ID'ers among us can think of it like a version of Quirky where you don't need to know anything about injection molding. In any case, here's how it works:
To draw publicity, DesignCrowd recently held an informal, internal design competition asking its users to re-design iOS 7. The submissions are different enough that they're bound to be divisive. But it makes me wonder if Apple would ever let iOS users choose their own icons, and if people would be willing to pay others for them, as with ringtones.
In any case, see anything you like? The one I find most visually appealing is the one that's probably the hardest to use, with its Breaking Bad-esque Periodic Table characters.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
If this stuff were released to the public under a copyleft license, that's a different story. Open Source takes from a lot of people, but it gives back everything to everyone. Not so with design contests for proprietary commercial interests.
I'm happy for the graphic design profession that that AIGA is taking a hard stance against spec work. I just wish someone in the industial design world would do the same, but the IDSA has proven completely worthless in defending designers. At the very least, could Core77 refrain from promoting this kind of scam?
It all adds up to something like this.
Get ready for more.
Don't promote it.
Just an emotional thought.
Someone has to take the risk.. and there is three parties here.
companies search for answers, for question they don't know. and they spec such problems arise from no conversation between the parties. Sounds like shallow misguided answers and a lot of work for nothing. Not to mention all of the problems can arise. This proposal looks naive and shallow just like the answers acquired from this site. maybe this can be used as an example to improve into a better business model.