Core77

U.S. Soldiers' Combat Invention Inspired by "Predator" Movie

By Rain Noe - October 26, 2012

in Object Culture

Medium and heavy machine guns are "crew-served" weapons, requiring two and even three soldiers working together to operate it at maximum efficiency. While it's one guy pulling the trigger, the other two carry and feed the bulky ammunition belts into the weapon.

Having to rapidly re-position the weapon therefore brings challenges. According to an article in Soldiers magazine, after a 2.5-hour firefight in Afghanistan, an American infantry combat team started discussing "how three-man teams manning crew-served weapons struggled to stay together over difficult terrain in fluid battles." It goes without saying that a machine gunner separated from his ammo is not good. It would be better if the gunner were self-contained, but that gun's not gonna feed itself.

Or could it? As a joke, one of the soldiers brought up Jesse Ventura's character in Predator, who runs around with a minigun fed by a box on his back. A simple one-person solution, as envisioned by some Hollywood propmaster.

What Ventura's character had was one long, continuous belt feeding uninterruptedly from the pack into his gun. But without that arrangement, the best a lone machine gunner could manage would be to carry individual 50-round belts to load himself—and stopping to reload every 50 rounds. That leads to lulls in fire, and the more times you reload, the more you increase the chances of the gun jamming. This is a design flaw with potentially life-or-death consequences. And so, following the "Predator" discussion, Staff Sergeant Vincent Winkowski thought about it and figured a back-mounted ammo rig might actually be doable.

So Winkowski grabbed an old ALICE (all-purpose lightweight individual carrying equipment) frame, welded two ammunition cans together—one atop the other after cutting the bottom out of the top can—and strapped the fused cans to the frame. To that he added a MOLLE (modular, lightweight load-carrying equipment) pouch to carry other equipment.

"We wondered why there wasn't some type of [system] that fed our machine guns [like the] mini-gun as portrayed in the movie," Winkowski said. "So, I decided to try it using the feed chute assembly off of [a vehicle-mounted weapons system]. We glued a piece of wood from an ammo crate inside the ammo cans to create the decreased space necessary so the rounds would not fall in on each other.

"My Mark 48 gunners, Spc. Derick Morgan and Spc. Aaron McNew, who also had input to the design and evaluation, took it to the range and tested it, and even with its initial shortcomings, it was much better than the current TTP (tactics, techniques and procedures) we employed. On Feb. 26, 2011, our prototype 'Ironman' pack even saw its first combat use by Spc. McNew when our squad was ambushed by up to 50 fighters in a river valley, and it worked great!"

"I'm not impressed!"

"I'm not impressed!"

Winkowski sent photos of the prototype to advisers from the Army's Research, Development and Engineering Command. The design was subsequently forwarded to the Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center we mentioned in this post on military bags.

Recognizing the excellence of the design, Natick gave it what's known as an "Immediate-Action prototyping effort." It had been fast-tracked, and in just 48 days a prototype was ready to go. (One significant change was swapping in polycarbonate for the jury-rigged ammo boxes.)

"We pretty much took their design and just reverse-engineered it and improved upon it," said Laura Winters, who headed up the fabrication effort. "Considering where we started from and what we got to, I think it worked very well. It was a very good collaborative effort...."

Then there's what I call the iPod factor:

As [Natick Operations Analyst Dave] Roy pointed out, technology isn't always about the whiz-bang stuff. "Sometimes," he added, "it's merely a simple application of existing technologies in a different format that provides an elegant way to fill a capability gap."

"...We've gotten some initial feedback from the Soldier and from his gunner on how to make some design changes," said Roy, "and we've incorporated the majority of those design changes. Minor stuff, but it's always the minor stuff that makes any kind of system more efficient and more user-friendly."

All of that happened in 2011, with a projected target of early 2012 to get the Ironman formally approved. Looks like it happened—I was able to locate an Army document, dated June 2012, seeking manufacturers for the device. It's been unsexily re-named the Large Capacity Ammunition Carriage System (apparently Ironman was already taken).

o

Favorite This
Q
13

Comment

Comments

roly

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

If necessity is the mother of invention, war is the grumpy father. You want inspiration? Try staying out the way of bullets...the survival instinct will motivate/inspire more than late night redbull fueled jam session, and Its fairly well documented that technolgy makes large and rapid leaps during times of war.
Funny though, I always assumed that Jesse Ventura's kit was real anyway.
!Report as spam
slippyfish

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

@Parker
Haha I wondered about that as well. Turns out that 'jury-rigged' also has its place, as a temporary lashing (or rigging) in sailing terms. There is some relation between 'jury' and 'jour' (or French for day), like the rigging is just good for a day. Jerry-rigged is similar though. Thanks Wikipedia.
!Report as spam
Parker

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Great article, but i noticed your use of the phrase "Jury-Rigged"... The correct colloquial phrase is "Jerry-Rigged" which originates from WWII. The Germans aka the "Jerries" were notoriously effective at in-field repairs to their equipment. Thus when the allies stumbled upon said equipment in its field repaired state would note its often ingenious improvisations as "Jerry-Rigged".
!Report as spam
slippyfish

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Different things inspire creativity in different people. Personally, I really like looking at cruise missiles, stealth fighters, and sci-fi/action film effects to get inspired to design anything. Military and defense stuff has the inspirational quality of hundreds of man-weeks of development in the service of no-BS purpose. The resulting products or forms can be extremely pure and amazing. I think everyone would be psyched looking at the SR-71 or the subtle surfacing on the Dark Star drone.
!Report as spam
lighthammer

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

@Noh
There is a program for service members to get money for their ideas. I cannot for the life of me remember the name of the program, but if those soldiers idea made it that far then they will see a nice cut from it. I had a first hand account for my guys and the program and they made out pretty well with their idea and we are still using it. It made life real easy for us in Iraq!!
!Report as spam
Ventura

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Let's focus our engergies on thinking of a good name for this great product! I propose the "Painless Pack" after Jesse Ventura's minigun :)
!Report as spam
Tylerius

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Meat, you have to accept that war is a part of life and that tools of destruction can be, and often are, just as creative as peace-ey things. I have seen men who are artists with a M-2 Browning, or flying a UH-60 blackhawk in adverse weather conditions under fire. Beauty and creativity don't only come through peaceful pursuits.
!Report as spam
Noh

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

So, this thing just appeared out of thin air with no input from anyone whatsoever, Meat?

Paul, even given a working model design, 48 days for a military project is lighting fast.

Phil, I suspect that because the grunts are gov't employees, they're not eligible. Sucks if I'm right, but that's the way the ball bounces.

Regarding the official name: Good thing they didn't go with "offensive" instead of "ammo". The jokes about "Large COCS" would never end. :P
!Report as spam
Martin

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

@Meat:

I think you should leave your judgemental attitude at the door, because with it, we would not have many good things, such as nuclear imaging, space travel, or modern computers.
!Report as spam
Spartin

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Aww Meat thats not very nice, these Soldiers who spend much of their life trying to make things easier for them and Soldiers to follow, using "creativity" they accomplished that. Maybe you should recognize it for what its worth OR ignore the article to avoid becoming butthurt.
!Report as spam
Meat

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

i don't think military weapons should be featured on this site regardless of how ingenious the concept. I come here to be inspired and nurture the creativity. Objects like this are made to execute destruction the opposite of creativity.
!Report as spam
Phil

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

I hope the "guys on the ground" get some of the monetary reward for this elegant idea. And I hope they live to enjoy it.
!Report as spam
Paul Pickard

12 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

48 DAYS? They must have taken a lot of coffee breaks.
I would think that could have been done a lot faster
!Report as spam