Melbourne-based product designer Jon Liow showcases a handful of interesting, conscientious and mostly minimal design concepts in his portfolio, but his latest project, "Lean," comes out of left field nonetheless. See it in action after the jump.
Well, if the title didn't give it away, "Lean" is a plate informed by user behavior. Liow explains:As a child, I remember being taught how to lean freshly toasted slices of bread against each together, in order to aerate the hot slices and allow them to become crispy. This going against the common practice of throwing them flat onto a plate, resulting in cold, soggy slices of bread.
Anyone who has caught on to this practice knows how hard it can sometimes be to stand two slices of toast up on the slippery surface of a clean plate.
The 'lean' dish is designed with this simple function in mind. Two subtle ridges are raised just high enough, and spaced just far enough apart, to support a varying range of bread slice sizes. It also works as a fully functional and ergonomic plate. Here's to crispy toast.
Love the presentation, but I'm not sure where to go from there. Maybe it's gesture-based: swipe the toast on the toppings, no knife necessary.
Perhaps Liow's concept is but a new frontier for what we'll call "post-toaster design": a survey of the first ten search results for "toaster" provides ample evidence (yes, each of those letters is a separate link to a separate toaster) that designers the world over have yet to perfect the art of heating sliced, leavened, wheat-based sources of carbohydrates.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
While we're on that: can someone design an automatic bagel slicer that can actually cut the bagel through the MIDDLE, regardless of thickness? Seriously, the toupee-look on my bagel does not a good breakfast make.
Thanks for your comment. The title (the only "criticism" in the piece) is a bad joke, picking up on previous posts I've done (search for "Looks Cool... But What Does It Actually Do"); I actually intended for "coming out of left field" to be a good thing, so apologies to anyone who read that as a critique.
My observation about the presentation is also meant to be tongue-in-cheek. The more I think about it, the more I think swiping the toast would actually work.
The point of the post-- and this is a response to Matthew as well-- is that perhaps it's not enough to re-design the electronic appliance, that there's more to (a user's experience of) toast consumption than the toaster itself. Frankly, I'd never heard of the toast-leaning technique before I saw Liow's design, so naturally a bespoke plate for this purpose struck me as a little bit absurd.
So yes, the writing is more rhetoric than analysis, but to Rick's point, the design is a thought piece and I figured it was worth presenting it as such. (To have to explain myself here just means that I didn't do as good a job describing the piece as Liow did in designing it.)
Best,
Ray
Core77 Editorial Team
It is pretty clearly explained in his description. I think it's this writer's criticism that is out of left field.