Let's say you controlled an enormous collection of significant design artifacts, located in a relatively remote region. Would you decide to a) keep them there, hoping design-lovers would make the pilgrimage and perhaps enrich the surrounding community, or b) move the collection to a major urban center (which already has more than its fair share of foot traffic) in a guarantee of more eyeballs?
That was the question faced by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation, which has 23,000 drawings, 44,000 photographs, and literally hundreds of thousands of ancillary materials from the iconic architect, all squirreled away at former FLW headquarters in both Wisconsin and Arizona. They've chosen option b); it has just been announced that they've struck a three-way deal with the MoMA and Columbia University's Avery Architectural & Fine Arts Library to move the massive collection to New York City.
So why did they do it? All parties involved sound off in this video below, released just this morning.
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
I believe when a greedy group of people go against the will and desire of the the owner of these artifacts and subjugate half truths in order to profit, they not only have acted criminally but will also fail. My answer is NO. I would not go to some museum in New York vs the school and farm and place of Frank Lloyd Wright. Shame on all of you for stealing.